From: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] [patch] 2.4.20-ia64-021210 new spinlock code
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 02:14:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705354@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590709805543@msgid-missing>
>>>>> On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 13:10:25 +1100, Keith Owens <kaos@sgi.com> said:
Keith> On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 17:53:05 -0800,
Keith> David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 12:49:33 +1100, Keith Owens <kaos@sgi.com> said:
>>
Keith> I am giving up on getting this patch into the community. It will be
Keith> applied to SGI ia64 kernels so they will be faster, smaller and have
Keith> better debugging. Community kernels will have to stay with the old
Keith> code and inferior debugging for hung spinlocks.
>>
>> Well, that's your right. But please explain to me, just why is it so
>> hard to bring up the issue with the ABI folks? That would have taken
>> less time than to argueing a moot point with me.
Keith> Because I want to get on with kdb now! Now after waiting for the ABI
Keith> folks to get up to speed. I am quite happy to talk to the ABI folks
Keith> but not if it means delaying my improvements to kdb. Put the code in
Keith> and I will talk to the ABI folks, otherwise I am not going to bother.
Send a mail to the ABI folks now (and cc me) and I'll put in the
version that makes the new code available via a config option;
otherwise _I_ won't bother. ;-)
--david
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-28 2:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-11 12:48 [Linux-ia64] [patch] 2.4.20-ia64-021210 prevent loop on zero instruction Keith Owens
2003-03-14 4:39 ` [Linux-ia64] [patch] 2.4.20-ia64-021210 unwind.c - allow unw_access_gr(r0) Keith Owens
2003-03-15 0:01 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2003-03-15 1:10 ` [Linux-ia64] [patch] 2.4.20-ia64-021210 new spinlock code Keith Owens
2003-03-15 1:30 ` David Mosberger
2003-03-15 2:36 ` Keith Owens
2003-03-15 2:40 ` Keith Owens
2003-03-15 6:46 ` David Mosberger
2003-03-15 10:31 ` Keith Owens
2003-03-27 20:29 ` David Mosberger
2003-03-27 23:15 ` Keith Owens
2003-03-27 23:32 ` David Mosberger
2003-03-28 1:39 ` Keith Owens
2003-03-28 1:45 ` David Mosberger
2003-03-28 1:49 ` Keith Owens
2003-03-28 1:53 ` David Mosberger
2003-03-28 2:10 ` Keith Owens
2003-03-28 2:14 ` David Mosberger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590723705354@msgid-missing \
--to=davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox