public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] spin_unlock() problem
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 21:09:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705426@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705414@msgid-missing>

>>>>> On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 23:51:04 -0500, Jes Sorensen <jes@wildopensource.com> said:

  Jes> Hi, I have been tracing a problem with tty->count hitting an
  Jes> unidenfied state and I am starting to ponder if our current
  Jes> spin_unlock() implementation is sufficient.

  Jes> Currently the spin_unlock() implementation looks like this:

  Jes> #define spin_unlock(x) do { barrier(); ((spinlock_t *) x)->lock
  Jes> = 0;} while (0)

  Jes> barrier() doesn't guarantee memory ordering, in other words, we
  Jes> are not guaranteed that writes have been flushed to physical
  Jes> memory on exit.

Note that "lock" is declared as "volatile", so clearing it will use
"release" semantics.  (Since I know you have a copy of the ia64 linux
kernel book: this is described in detail starting on page 302).

	--david


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-04-07 21:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-04  4:51 [Linux-ia64] spin_unlock() problem Jes Sorensen
2003-04-04  5:04 ` Jes Sorensen
2003-04-04 14:43 ` Van Maren, Kevin
2003-04-04 14:49 ` Van Maren, Kevin
2003-04-04 15:13 ` Jes Sorensen
2003-04-07 21:09 ` David Mosberger [this message]
2003-04-07 21:14 ` David Mosberger
2003-04-07 22:09 ` Jes Sorensen
2003-04-07 22:18 ` Luck, Tony
2003-04-07 22:58 ` David Mosberger
2003-04-07 23:13 ` Jes Sorensen
2003-04-07 23:30 ` Jim Hull
2003-04-07 23:38 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2003-04-08  0:14 ` David Mosberger
2003-04-08  0:15 ` David Mosberger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590723705426@msgid-missing \
    --to=davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox