From: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] gdb problem unwinding abort in signal
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 18:29:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705469@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705468@msgid-missing>
>>>>> On Fri, 11 Apr 2003 13:17:38 -0500, Mario Smarduch <cms063@email.mot.com> said:
Mario> When our application aborts in the signal handler (no
Mario> altstack is setup) the stack backtrace discontinues at the
Mario> signal handler.
Mario> (gdb) where #0 0x20000000000a6342 in kill () at soinit.c:56
Mario> #1 0x20000000000a61f0 in raise (sig=6) at
Mario> ../sysdeps/posix/raise.c:27 #2 0x20000000000a8a70 in abort ()
Mario> at ../sysdeps/generic/abort.c:88 #3 0x4000000000000910 in
Mario> sig_report_and_die ()
Mario> Manually unwinding the stack shows the rp set to
Mario> ia64_sigtramp(). The privilaged gate page simplifies allot of
Mario> things, but it poses a problem to our software because we
Mario> send events for all signals of importance, and count on the
Mario> core dump to capture the full call trace prior to and
Mario> including the signal - gdb displays this full backtrace on
Mario> all other architectures we run on.
Mario> If this is the problem how does one get around it besides
Mario> manually unwinding the stack?
There is a gdb patch in the works that will use libunwind for
backtracing purposes. Unwinding across signal handlers will work just
fine then (at least with reasonably recent kernels). An old
(alpha-quality) snapshot of such a gdb is at:
ftp://ftp.hpl.hp.com/pub/linux-ia64/ugdb-ia64-020531.tar.gz
and someone from Red Hat is now working on updating the gdb patch for
libunwind v0.9 (and hopefully on getting it into the official gdb
tree).
--david
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-11 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-11 18:17 [Linux-ia64] gdb problem unwinding abort in signal Mario Smarduch
2003-04-11 18:29 ` David Mosberger [this message]
2003-04-11 18:48 ` Mario Smarduch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590723705469@msgid-missing \
--to=davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox