public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Adriano Galano" <adriano@satec.es>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [Linux-ia64] benchmarking results
Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 09:08:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705635@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705621@msgid-missing>

Hi Steve:

> > >>>>> On Wed, 30 Apr 2003 18:17:45 +0200, "Adriano Galano"
> <adriano@satec.es> said:
> >
> >   Adriano> We need to find some reference of SMP
> scalability on Linux
> >   Adriano> scheduler. For 1, 2, 4 and 8 processor. How "lineal" is
> >   Adriano> this scalability? Does Linux perform well en 4
> or 8 Itanium
> >   Adriano> 2 architecture?
> >
> > David Mosberger wrote:
> > There is no single answer to the scalability question.  It totally
> > depends on what application you're running.  SGI has shown that
> > certain apps scale very nicely all the way to 64 CPUs on their Altix
> > box.  Kernel-intensive apps won't scale that far, but even
> there there
> > is some evendice of very nice scaling.  ...
>
> Hi Adriano,
>
> As David points out, there's a lot of factors that can affect
> scalability
> results for a particular workload.  If you haven't already,
> you might want
> to check out the following from the February 2003 issue of
> Linux Journal
> magazine: http://linuxjournal.com/article.php?sidd40, which
> provides more
> background on the SGI Altix system along with some scaling
> and benchmark results.
>

Thanks for the reference.

Maybe in all the cases I can see NUMA architectures and not find references
related to what kind of scheduler was used older sched, O(1) or HT? The
limits of the bricks for SMP are 4 proc, how could I assume linear
scalability for 8 proc having memory latency accesing the others bricks
through R-Brick maybe?

Regards,

-Adriano

> Hope that helps.
>
> --steve



  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-05-05  9:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-30 10:54 [Linux-ia64] benchmarking results Adriano Galano
2003-04-30 11:15 ` Duraid Madina
2003-04-30 16:13 ` David Mosberger
2003-04-30 16:17 ` Adriano Galano
2003-04-30 17:33 ` David Mosberger
2003-04-30 18:08 ` Steve Neuner
2003-05-05  9:08 ` Adriano Galano [this message]
2003-05-05 15:46 ` Steve Neuner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590723705635@msgid-missing \
    --to=adriano@satec.es \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox