From: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [Linux-ia64] High fpu register corruption
Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 16:58:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705685@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705679@msgid-missing>
>>>>> On Thu, 8 May 2003 09:33:55 -0700, "Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@intel.com> said:
Asit> Andreas, The high FP save and restore in the context switch
Asit> makes the assumption that user will not be modifying the
Asit> psr.mfh and it will be only updated by the hardware.
Not a chance. We can't rely on the application doing the Right Thing.
In fact, having an application clear psr.mfh makes tons of sense,
when it knows it's done using mfh.
Asit> Without this assumption we can not optimize the FP
Asit> save/restore for SMP systems (this patch will not cover all
Asit> cases). If application wants the current high fpu state to be
Asit> preserved then it should will not be able to modify the
Asit> psr.mfh.
Asit> What kind of applications are trying to modify the mfh?
OpenSSL does (really: some underlying crypto code).
I think you're misunderstanding the problem though: the problem is
that application A clears psr.mfh and application B gets its fph state
corrupted.
So, really, this is just a bug that needs fixing. It won't affect the
rest of the lazy fph save/restore logic.
--david
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-08 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-08 14:16 [Linux-ia64] High fpu register corruption Andreas Schwab
2003-05-08 16:33 ` Mallick, Asit K
2003-05-08 16:42 ` Chris Mason
2003-05-08 16:58 ` David Mosberger [this message]
2003-05-08 17:03 ` David Mosberger
2003-05-08 17:14 ` Mallick, Asit K
2003-05-08 17:55 ` David Mosberger
2003-05-22 21:55 ` [Linux-ia64] High fpu register corruption (PATCH) Mallick, Asit K
2003-05-29 3:53 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2003-05-29 4:10 ` David Mosberger
2003-05-29 4:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2003-05-29 4:40 ` David Mosberger
2003-05-29 5:43 ` Mallick, Asit K
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590723705685@msgid-missing \
--to=davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox