public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [Linux-ia64] High fpu register corruption
Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 16:58:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705685@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705679@msgid-missing>

>>>>> On Thu, 8 May 2003 09:33:55 -0700, "Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@intel.com> said:

  Asit> Andreas, The high FP save and restore in the context switch
  Asit> makes the assumption that user will not be modifying the
  Asit> psr.mfh and it will be only updated by the hardware.

Not a chance.  We can't rely on the application doing the Right Thing.
In fact, having an application clear psr.mfh makes tons of sense,
when it knows it's done using mfh.

  Asit> Without this assumption we can not optimize the FP
  Asit> save/restore for SMP systems (this patch will not cover all
  Asit> cases). If application wants the current high fpu state to be
  Asit> preserved then it should will not be able to modify the
  Asit> psr.mfh.

  Asit> What kind of applications are trying to modify the mfh?

OpenSSL does (really: some underlying crypto code).

I think you're misunderstanding the problem though: the problem is
that application A clears psr.mfh and application B gets its fph state
corrupted.

So, really, this is just a bug that needs fixing.  It won't affect the
rest of the lazy fph save/restore logic.

	--david


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-05-08 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-08 14:16 [Linux-ia64] High fpu register corruption Andreas Schwab
2003-05-08 16:33 ` Mallick, Asit K
2003-05-08 16:42 ` Chris Mason
2003-05-08 16:58 ` David Mosberger [this message]
2003-05-08 17:03 ` David Mosberger
2003-05-08 17:14 ` Mallick, Asit K
2003-05-08 17:55 ` David Mosberger
2003-05-22 21:55 ` [Linux-ia64] High fpu register corruption (PATCH) Mallick, Asit K
2003-05-29  3:53 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2003-05-29  4:10 ` David Mosberger
2003-05-29  4:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2003-05-29  4:40 ` David Mosberger
2003-05-29  5:43 ` Mallick, Asit K

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590723705685@msgid-missing \
    --to=davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox