From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 22:27:39 +0000
Subject: RE: [Linux-ia64] Re: [PATCH] head.S fix for unusual load addrs
Message-Id: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705697@msgid-missing>
List-Id: <linux-ia64.vger.kernel.org>
References: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705550@msgid-missing>
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705550@msgid-missing>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org

> On Thu, 8 May 2003 10:07:49 -0700, 
> David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com> wrote:
> >If we do have to go the virtual remapping route, my preference would
> >be to stick the kernel somewhere in region 5 (0xa..).  Has anyone
> >tried that?  It should work fine in principle (modules 
> already live in
> >that space).
> 
> That loses the alt[id]tlb handling for the kernel code and data.  Is
> that going to be a performance problem?

I assume that we are still planning to lock the translations for
the kernel into ITR[0] and DTR[0] ... we can still do this with
the kernel mapped in region 5.

-Tony