From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Wienand Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 23:24:05 +0000 Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] libc umount and umount2 can't both be right Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org [originally cc: libc-alpha but screwed up the cc line so it was rejected here] >On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 04:06:41PM -0400, MONTGOMERY,BOB (HP-FtCollins,ex1) wrote: > In libc, umount and umount2 are the same code. They both use > syscall number 1044 without introducing a call layer. looks like a typo in libc to me -i ianw@gelato.unsw.edu.au http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au --- libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/ia64/syscalls.list.old 2003-05-14 09:10:04.000000000 +1000 +++ libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/ia64/syscalls.list 2003-05-14 09:09:40.000000000 +1000 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # File name Caller Syscall name # args Strong name Weak names -umount2 - umount 2 __umount2 umount2 +umount2 - umount2 2 __umount2 umount2 # Whee! 64-bit systems naturally implement llseek. llseek EXTRA lseek C:3 __libc_lseek __lseek lseek __libc_lseek64 __llseek llseek __lseek64 lseek64