From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Schwab Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 08:31:24 +0000 Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] libc umount and umount2 can't both be right Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org Ian Wienand writes: |> [originally cc: libc-alpha but screwed up the cc line so it was rejected= here] |>=20 |> >On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 04:06:41PM -0400, MONTGOMERY,BOB (HP-FtCollins,= ex1) wrote: |> > In libc, umount and umount2 are the same code. They both use |> > syscall number 1044 without introducing a call layer.=20 |>=20 |> looks like a typo in libc to me |>=20 |> -i |> ianw@gelato.unsw.edu.au |> http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au |>=20 |> --- libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/ia64/syscalls.list.old 2003-05-14 09:10= :04.000000000 +1000 |> +++ libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/ia64/syscalls.list 2003-05-14 09:09= :40.000000000 +1000 |> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ |> # File name Caller Syscall name # args Strong name Weak nam= es |> =20 |> -umount2 - umount 2 __umount2 = umount2 |> +umount2 - umount2 2 __umount2 = umount2 Except there is no umount2 syscall on ia64. Andreas. --=20 Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 N=FCrnberg Key fingerprint =3D 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."