From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 17:27:02 +0000
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] new bitkeeper tree for 2.5 linux/ia64 kernel
Message-Id: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705801@msgid-missing>
List-Id: <linux-ia64.vger.kernel.org>
References: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705780@msgid-missing>
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705780@msgid-missing>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org

>>>>> On 14 May 2003 09:37:54 -0400, Jes Sorensen <jes@wildopensource.com> said:

>>>>> "David" = David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com> writes:
  David> My hidden agenda is of course to encourage more folks to keep
  David> pushing fixes back to Linus, so that by the time 2.6 comes
  David> around, the ia64 kernel will build directly from Linus' source
  David> tree.  We're actually reasonably close at the moment.

  Jes> Just to be sure, your hidden agenda doesn't include a clause about no
  Jes> longer releasing patches on a regular basis?

Not at all.  BitKeeper isn't Open Source and I'm certainly not going
to force anybody into using it.

	--david