From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keith Owens Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 23:53:56 +0000 Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] new bitkeeper tree for 2.5 linux/ia64 kernel Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 14 May 2003 10:27:02 -0700, David Mosberger wrote: >>>>>> On 14 May 2003 09:37:54 -0400, Jes Sorensen said: > >>>>>> "David" = David Mosberger writes: > David> My hidden agenda is of course to encourage more folks to keep > David> pushing fixes back to Linus, so that by the time 2.6 comes > David> around, the ia64 kernel will build directly from Linus' source > David> tree. We're actually reasonably close at the moment. > > Jes> Just to be sure, your hidden agenda doesn't include a clause about no > Jes> longer releasing patches on a regular basis? > >Not at all. BitKeeper isn't Open Source and I'm certainly not going >to force anybody into using it. Are you going to set up the automatic patch extraction from this tree, like ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/ports/ia64/v2.4/testing/cset?