From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 15:48:07 +0000
Subject: [Linux-ia64] Re: 64 Bits DMA Addresses for Alloc Consistent Interfaces.
Message-Id: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705828@msgid-missing>
List-Id: <linux-ia64.vger.kernel.org>
References: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705823@msgid-missing>
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705823@msgid-missing>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org

>>>>> On 15 May 2003 10:12:48 -0500, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> said:

  James> On Thu, 2003-05-15 at 10:06, David Mosberger wrote:
  >> James and I have been discussing this very point for the last
  >> week or so.  My preferred solution is to add an explicit dma-mask
  >> argument to coherent/non-coherent allocators, but James prefers
  >> to do this via a new GFP flag (GFP_DMA32 or some such).

  James> This is still being hashed out.  It looks like adding a the
  James> _mask variants may still be a viable runner for 2.6.

That would be good.

	--david