From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Colin Ngam <cngam@sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 00:32:15 +0000
Subject: [Linux-ia64] Re: 64 Bits DMA Addresses for Alloc Consistent Interfaces.
Message-Id: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705877@msgid-missing>
List-Id: <linux-ia64.vger.kernel.org>
References: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705823@msgid-missing>
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705823@msgid-missing>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org

James Bottomley wrote:

> On Thu, 2003-05-15 at 19:17, David S. Miller wrote:
> > Having to support DAC cycles does not mean that it must support full
> > 64-bit DMA addresses in it's descriptors.
> >
> > A cost sensitive PCI-X device may wish to use 32-bit addressing in
> > it's descriptors in order to keep pin counts down etc.
>
> This is certainly a property of the aic79xx driver (only using 32 bit
> descriptor tables).  It has this nice code in the driver for doing it:
>
> aic79xx.c:
>
>         /*
>          * Although we can dma data above 4GB, our
>          * "consistent" memory is below 4GB for
>          * space efficiency reasons (only need a 4byte
>          * address).  For this reason, we have to reset
>          * our dma mask when doing allocations.
>          */
>         if (ahd->dev_softc != NULL)
>                 ahd_pci_set_dma_mask(ahd->dev_softc, 0xFFFFFFFF);
>         *vaddr = pci_alloc_consistent(ahd->dev_softc,
>                                       dmat->maxsize, &map->bus_addr);
>         if (ahd->dev_softc != NULL)
>                 ahd_pci_set_dma_mask(ahd->dev_softc,
>                                      ahd->platform_data->hw_dma_mask);
>
> And it comes in PCI-X flavours.

Yes agreed.  And I think this is fine.  But let's not have the interface
prevents 64bits drivers that wants to do DAC.  that's all I am
asking ..

Thanks.

colin

>
>
> James