From: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] sigaltstack and ar.bspstore
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 16:32:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723706088@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723706086@msgid-missing>
>>>>> On Sat, 31 May 2003 00:18:39 +1000, Matt Chapman <matthewc@cse.unsw.edu.au> said:
Matt> Presumably the result should be the same as the original
Matt> bspstore. However, it isn't in the case when the original
Matt> bspstore is pointing to slot 63 (the RNAT word). The new
Matt> bspstore comes out pointing to slot 0 of the next group, and
Matt> the RNAT bits never get written. This happens more often then
Matt> you'd expect, since it seems that current implementations make
Matt> the optimisation of writing the RNAT word together with the
Matt> first word of the new group instead of the last word of the
Matt> old group (sensible because it potentially saves a write).
Yes, I noticed the same in libunwind. ;-/
Matt> I'd propose that the trampoline code should save bspstore in
Matt> the sigcontext structure and restore it from there rather than
Matt> recalculating it. I can send a patch, but first is there any
Matt> reason why it shouldn't be done that way?
My preference would be to fix it in a way that preserves binary
compatibility for the sigcontext structure.
--david
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-30 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-30 14:18 [Linux-ia64] sigaltstack and ar.bspstore Matt Chapman
2003-05-30 16:32 ` David Mosberger [this message]
2003-05-31 1:31 ` Matt Chapman
2003-05-31 3:16 ` David Mosberger
2003-06-21 6:05 ` David Mosberger
2003-06-21 6:58 ` Matt Chapman
2003-06-23 19:16 ` David Mosberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590723706088@msgid-missing \
--to=davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox