From: jbarnes@sgi.com (Jesse Barnes)
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] heads up: i/o mmu related changes
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 18:37:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723706204@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723706202@msgid-missing>
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:36:57AM -0700, David Mosberger wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 01:07:18 -0700, David Mosberger <davidm@linux.hpl.hp.com> said:
>
> David> I justed checked in a changeset
> David> (davidm@tiger.hpl.hp.com|ChangeSet|20030610070955|57077) to
> David> make the kernel work better for machines with I/O MMU. This
> David> should fix the long-standing bug where IDE disks on machines
> David> with memory above 4GB would MCA if the machine has an I/O
> David> MMU.
>
> David> The trick was to make PCI_DMA_BUS_IS_PHYS a variable which is
> David> set at runtime. Machines with I/O MMUs or machines with PCI
> David> buses which live in separate address spaces MUST clear this
> David> variable. I updated the code for the zx1 I/O MMU. I didn't
> David> touch the SGI I/O MMU code, though, as I wouldn't be able to
> David> test it.
>
> Actually, you may want to hold off on this one. I think I'll need to
> fine-tune this a bit more. My current thinking is that we need a
> variable ia64_max_iommu_page_size or something like that, which will
> tell us what to set BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY to.
Ok, the changes for sn2 look pretty straightforward. FYI, our IOMMU
supports 4k and 16k pages.
Thanks,
Jesse
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-10 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-10 8:07 [Linux-ia64] heads up: i/o mmu related changes David Mosberger
2003-06-10 17:36 ` David Mosberger
2003-06-10 18:37 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590723706204@msgid-missing \
--to=jbarnes@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox