public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grant Grundler <iod00d@hp.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SCSI ERRORS triggered by BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 20:24:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105640005723820@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105604433402604@msgid-missing>

On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 09:52:06AM -0700, David Mosberger wrote:
> No, BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY must be 0xffffffffffffffff if there is no
> hardware I/O MMU present (i.e., the I/O MMU page size is 2^64) and
> PAGE_SIZE if an I/O MMU is present (which can support PAGE_SIZE
> pages).

yes - that's what I thought. I'm just having problems counting tildes.

#define BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY   (0UL)//(ia64_max_iommu_merge_mask + 1)

Which for sba_iommu should have been:
   (ia64_max_iommu_merge_mask + 1)
		= (~IOVP_MASK + 1)
		= (~PAGE_MASK + 1)
		= (~(~(PAGE_SIZE-1)) + 1)
		= PAGE_SIZE

(I hope I have that right now)

> No, you got this backwards:

:^(

> the bio-level code _assumes_ that
> discontiguous physical pages can be remapped linearly by the I/O MMU
> code.  If the I/O MMU code doesn't actually do the merging, the kernel
> will fall flat on its face.

uhmm...why does the bio-level code care what can/can't be merged if
it's not going to do it?

Seems like a waste of CPU cycles to walk the sg_list an extra time
in the IOMMU code to figure what can (and will) be merged.  My gut
feeling is bio-level code doesn't know enough to do it efficiently
and the IOMMU code needs to walk the list at least once to program
the HW (effectively twice if sba_iommu wants to attempt coalescing).

thanks,
grant

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-06-23 20:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-06-19 17:36 SCSI ERRORS triggered by BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY David Mosberger
2003-06-19 20:48 ` Jesse Barnes
2003-06-19 21:47 ` Grant Grundler
2003-06-23  7:11 ` Grant Grundler
2003-06-23 15:04 ` Alex Williamson
2003-06-23 16:52 ` David Mosberger
2003-06-23 20:24 ` Grant Grundler [this message]
2003-06-23 20:41 ` David Mosberger
2003-06-23 22:05 ` Grant Grundler
2003-06-23 22:14 ` David Mosberger
2003-06-24 21:07 ` Grant Grundler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105640005723820@msgid-missing \
    --to=iod00d@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox