From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Erich Focht Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 08:23:37 +0000 Subject: Re: [Discontig-devel] [PATCH] another discontig patch Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org > > Same comment as above. NEC TX7 is an IA64_DIG platform. > > Oops, sorry. Here's another one. How does it look? ... > --- a/arch/ia64/Kconfig Wed Jul 16 15:36:33 2003 > +++ b/arch/ia64/Kconfig Wed Jul 16 15:36:33 2003 > @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ > > config NUMA > bool "Enable NUMA support" if IA64_GENERIC || IA64_DIG || IA64_HP_ZX1 > - default y if IA64_SGI_SN2 > + default y if IA64_SGI_SN2 || IA64_GENERIC > help > Say Y to compile the kernel to support NUMA (Non-Uniform Memory > Access). This option is for configuring high-end multiprocessor > @@ -234,9 +234,8 @@ > endchoice OK. Thanks. > > config DISCONTIGMEM > - bool > - depends on IA64_SGI_SN2 || (IA64_GENERIC || IA64_DIG || IA64_HP_ZX1) && > NUMA - default y > + bool "Discontiguous memory support" if IA64_DIG > + default y if IA64_SGI_SN2 || IA64_GENERIC > help > Say Y to support efficient handling of discontiguous physical memory, > for architectures which are either NUMA (Non-Uniform Memory Access) > @@ -245,8 +244,7 @@ Maybe that should better be bool "Discontiguous memory support" if (IA64_DIG && NUMA) Discontigmem alone doesn't make sense, yet, I think... Regards, Erich