public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@hpl.hp.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: HP_SIM with performance monitoring
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 18:16:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-106192195729229@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-106186435806640@msgid-missing>

Ian,

On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 12:18:46PM +1000, Ian Wienand wrote:
> 
> I noticed that when trying to boot 2.6.0-test4 in the simulator with
> perfmon turned on it ended up oopsing with a "General Exception: IA-64
> Reserved Register/Field fault" in pfm_init_percpu() when it tried to
> zero out the PMD registers.
> 

That does not surprise me. The simulator does have some PMD and PMC registers
but they do not count anything.

> I have no idea if the simulator implements perfmon support, but
> noticed that there are PMC and PMD registers in the register window.
> Am I right in saying the simulator has only 8, skipping odd registers,
> where mckinley has 15 PMC and 17 PMD registers?

Ski seems to have 16 PMCS and 16 PMDS implemented.

> 
> I can think of a number of things to fix it but am not sure which is
> correct -- the GENERIC definitions look kind of correct; maybe
> CONFIG_PERFMON should be turned off for HP_SIM; or create a dummy
> PMC/PMD register definition (attached).  Any enlightenment
> appreciated.

Yes, something along the lines of your patch would be a clean way of fixing
the problem. However, I would do something similar to what is in 
perfmon_generic.h. Simply define the PMDS as counters (PFM_REG_COUNTING). 
It will not hurt because they actually do not count anything. And create 
the PMC table as counter (PFM_REG_COUNTING).

Thanks for spotting this problem.

--
-Stephane

  reply	other threads:[~2003-08-26 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-26  2:18 HP_SIM with performance monitoring Ian Wienand
2003-08-26 18:16 ` Stephane Eranian [this message]
2003-08-27  1:17 ` Ian Wienand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-106192195729229@msgid-missing \
    --to=eranian@hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox