From: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com.br>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.4 force_successful_syscall()
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 20:00:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-106382885707991@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-106323341214232@msgid-missing>
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Here's a 2.4 backport of this change to 2.5:
>
> http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/cset@1.1046.238.7?nav=index.html
>
> Alpha, ppc, and sparc64 define force_successful_syscall_return() in 2.5,
> but since it's not obvious to me how to do it correctly in 2.4, I left
> them unchanged.
Whats the reasoning behing this patch?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-17 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-10 22:26 [PATCH] 2.4 force_successful_syscall() Bjorn Helgaas
2003-09-17 20:00 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2003-09-17 21:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2003-09-18 5:48 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2003-09-18 5:54 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-106382885707991@msgid-missing \
--to=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com.br \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox