From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shailabh Nagar Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 20:50:51 +0000 Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] CPUSET Proposal Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org Shailabh Nagar wrote: > > CKRM shares some aspects of the first objective i.e. it also seeks > performance isolation for arbitrary groups of processes (classes) too > but differs in that it > - uses scheduler modifications to achieve isolation > - has a quantitative measures for how much resource is used Let me modify that since CPUSETs also provides a coarse-grain (#cpus) quantitative measure. CKRM allows % of the total resource (cpu ticks, mem pages etc.) to be specified and is consequently at a finer granularity.