From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sylvain Jeaugey Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 07:17:57 +0000 Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: CPUSET Proposal Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Hubertus Franke wrote: > Again, I see cpusets and CKRM as addressing two orthogonal issues wrt to > cpu's > > cpusets (partitioning in space) with hierarchies > CKRM (time partitioning) how much of time does a class get... We do agree. We took a look at CKRM and that is the conclusion we achieved. At first sight, it could look like the goal are the same -and in some points it is- but the two approaches are different. It looks like it would be better to combine them rather to try to merge them. Sylvain