From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jbarnes@sgi.com (Jesse Barnes) Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 22:45:16 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.0test5: 2 of 3] MCA/TLB recovery Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 03:39:45PM -0700, David Mosberger wrote: > >>>>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 14:44:04 -0700, "Luck, Tony" said: > > Tony> Any comments on parts 1 & 3??? > > I'm still catching up with my mail backlog, so I didn't have time to > look at it very carefully, but from what I saw, they looked fine to > me. The big issue now, of course, is that Linus wants to be in > bug-fix-only, so the cosmetic fixes would have to be removed from the > patch before I can accept it. Really, even for ia64 code? Does that mean all the changes I've recently pushed you will be dropped? What about the fix for CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM + CONFIG_VIRTUAL_MEM_MAP that I've been working so hard to clean up? Thanks, Jesse