From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 04:55:29 +0000
Subject: Re: IA64 ino_t incorrectly sized?
Message-Id: <marc-linux-ia64-106567552721060@msgid-missing>
List-Id: <linux-ia64.vger.kernel.org>
References: <marc-linux-ia64-106378281914262@msgid-missing>
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-106378281914262@msgid-missing>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 08:53:37PM -0700, David Mosberger wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 13:15:01 +1000, Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com> said:
> 
>   Nathan> I did not review every possible interface for use of ino_t,
>   Nathan> no.  I suppose that needs to be done, I don't have that kind
>   Nathan> of time available just now.
> 
> Well, then don't be surprised if it doesn't get fixed!

s/fixed/merged/

I'm not surprised, and I can understand your position.  I'll
come back to do an audit when I can, if noone beats me to it
in the meantime.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan