From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: IA64 ino_t incorrectly sized?
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 13:40:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-106622533612093@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-106378281914262@msgid-missing>
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 02:29:21PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 02:54:53PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 11:25:04AM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > > I'd appreciate any suggestions about a cleaner way to do the
> > > common types.h and nfsd/syscall.h header changes.
> >
> > First question: What about other LP64 arches besides IA64. IMHO
> > having differen't ino_t on different LP64 arches is a rather bad idea.
>
> All architectures typedef __kernel_ino_t to unsigned long except alpha,
> ia64 and s390x. I guess ia64 just copied the wrong architecture at
> the beginning.
So we should probably change introduce __HAVE_BROKEN_INO_T for alpha
and s390x? Even better those should get new versions of the relevant
syscalls, I expect at least s390x to want them one day.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-15 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-17 7:10 IA64 ino_t incorrectly sized? Nathan Scott
2003-09-17 14:33 ` Jes Sorensen
2003-09-17 17:26 ` David Mosberger
2003-09-29 5:52 ` Nathan Scott
2003-10-08 23:51 ` David Mosberger
2003-10-09 1:25 ` Nathan Scott
2003-10-09 1:57 ` David Mosberger
2003-10-09 3:15 ` Nathan Scott
2003-10-09 3:53 ` David Mosberger
2003-10-09 4:55 ` Nathan Scott
2003-10-09 20:46 ` David Mosberger
2003-10-10 2:22 ` Nathan Scott
2003-10-15 1:25 ` Nathan Scott
2003-10-15 1:48 ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-15 4:47 ` David Mosberger
2003-10-15 5:18 ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-15 6:06 ` Nathan Scott
2003-10-15 6:16 ` Nathan Scott
2003-10-15 6:21 ` David Mosberger
2003-10-15 6:28 ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-15 6:34 ` Nathan Scott
2003-10-15 12:42 ` Andi Kleen
2003-10-15 12:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-10-15 13:29 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-10-15 13:40 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2003-10-15 16:32 ` David Mosberger
2003-10-15 16:59 ` David Mosberger
2003-10-15 17:40 ` David Mosberger
2003-10-15 23:40 ` Neil Brown
2003-10-16 1:20 ` David Mosberger
2003-10-16 22:47 ` Nathan Scott
2003-10-17 0:47 ` Neil Brown
2003-10-17 1:56 ` Nathan Scott
2003-10-21 3:37 ` Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-106622533612093@msgid-missing \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox