From: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] xbow.c kmalloc fixes
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 20:08:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-106642330107163@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-106641220628729@msgid-missing>
>>>>> On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 10:37:54 -0700, jbarnes@sgi.com (Jesse Barnes) said:
Jesse> On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 10:31:27AM -0700, David Mosberger
Jesse> wrote:
>> So what should be done about these SN2 cleanups? I don't want to
>> accept dozens of small "fixes" (which really are mostly cleanups)
>> as that would defeat the idea of the code-fixes-only decree. On
>> the other hand, I really would like to see the SN2 code cleaned
>> up so we actually have a sane base to do bug fixes on top of.
Jesse> Unfortunately, many of the cleanups and fixes (of which there
Jesse> are many) are now intertwined.
Yes, I understand and I don't think it makes sense to seprate them
out, since the cleanups are so badly needed, they should count as
fixes...
>> Perhaps it would actually be a better idea to have one big SN2
>> cleanup patch which gets applied directly by Andrew? It seems
>> like he would be OK with a one-time exception (since the code had
>> been in the works and since the old code is so gross) and as long
>> as the patch doesn't break GENERIC compiles, I'm going to be OK
>> with it anyhow. How about it?
Jesse> Sounds good to me. Pat, do you have one big patch you can
Jesse> send to Andrew that includes Jes' latest checkins? Let me
Jesse> know if you need help testing it.
Great!
--david
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-17 20:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-17 17:31 [patch] xbow.c kmalloc fixes David Mosberger
2003-10-17 17:37 ` Jesse Barnes
2003-10-17 17:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-10-17 20:08 ` David Mosberger [this message]
2003-10-17 20:11 ` David Mosberger
2003-10-18 1:17 ` Colin Ngam
2003-10-20 8:34 ` Jes Sorensen
2003-10-20 8:46 ` Jes Sorensen
2003-10-20 18:25 ` David Mosberger
2003-10-20 18:50 ` Colin Ngam
2003-10-20 20:43 ` David Mosberger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-17 13:04 Jes Sorensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-106642330107163@msgid-missing \
--to=davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox