From: Ionut Georgescu <george@physik.tu-cottbus.de>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Itanium2@900MHz slower than alpha@666MHz ?
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 15:14:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-106700871121653@msgid-missing> (raw)
Hello,
I am puzzled about the speed of a zx2000 workstation with a 900Mhz CPU.
According to the SPECfp2000 benchmarks, this workstation should be about
twice as fast as a DS10 alpha workstation and according to the fftw2
benchmarks at least 50% faster (double precision, real data, 256x256 FFT
transforms). I ran the fftw2 benchmark myself and I could reproduce the
data on fftw.org
However, my program is about 40% slower on the zx2000 as on the alpha.
It only does some Fourier transforms (fftw2, 256x256) and some matrix
operations (sort of an inner product). Both fftw2 and the program have
been compiled with ecc -O2 -ipo -limf. ecc is Version 7.1, Build
20030307.
Both the alpha and the Itanium2 run Debian stable and kernel 2.4.20.
Is there anything else I can do to improve performance ? I tried to some
profiling (CFLAGS="-g -p -Ob0 -O0 -inline_debug_info"), but the report
is missing the call-graph and a lot of other information, so that I
can't trust the quality of those data. Right now I'm trying to dig my
way through qprof and pfmon (for the moment qprof fails when
QPROF_HW_EVENT is set).
Thanks a lot,
Ionut
--
***************
* Ionut Georgescu
* http://www.physik.tu-cottbus.de/~george/
* Registered Linux User #244479
*
* "In Windows you can do everything Microsoft wants you to do; in Unix you
* can do anything the computer is able to do."
next reply other threads:[~2003-10-24 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-24 15:14 Ionut Georgescu [this message]
2003-10-24 15:35 ` Itanium2@900MHz slower than alpha@666MHz ? Matthew Wilcox
2003-10-24 16:26 ` Ionut Georgescu
2003-10-24 16:49 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-10-24 16:55 ` Grant Grundler
2003-10-24 17:10 ` Stephane Eranian
2003-10-24 17:42 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2003-10-24 18:36 ` David Mosberger
2003-10-24 18:55 ` Ionut Georgescu
2003-10-24 18:59 ` Ionut Georgescu
2003-10-24 20:25 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2003-10-24 20:36 ` Chen, Kenneth W
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-106700871121653@msgid-missing \
--to=george@physik.tu-cottbus.de \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox