public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Takayoshi Kochi <kochi@hpc.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: percpu data for non-existant cpus
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 01:43:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-106791036330723@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-106790736528585@msgid-missing>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 859 bytes --]

Hi,

From: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
Subject: percpu data for non-existant cpus
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 18:55:24 -0600

> It was neccessary in 2.4 to allocate cpu_data areas for
> non-existent cpus. I forget where, but some generic
> initialization code expected to be able to reference cpu_data 
> for all cpus up to NR_CPUS.
> 
> Does 2.6 have the same requirement or can I allocate cpu_data
> areas only for cpus that exist or might exist (cpu_possible()).

The current discontig (for both 2.4 & 2.6) only allocate
cpu_data on existing nodes (which means existing cpus
eventually), doesn't it?

We've found wrap_mmu_context() refers to all percpu data
and if the any of the cpu_data is not valid,
it may cause panic.

Attached patches are for 2.4 & 2.6, which are harmless
even when percpu data are allocated for non-existing
cpus.

---
Takayoshi Kochi

[-- Attachment #2: wrap_mmu_context-2.4.patch --]
[-- Type: Text/Plain, Size: 395 bytes --]

--- linux-2.4.22/arch/ia64/mm/tlb.c.orig	Fri Sep 12 09:45:18 2003
+++ linux-2.4.22/arch/ia64/mm/tlb.c	Wed Oct  8 17:56:03 2003
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@
 	 * and because interrupts are disabled during context switch.
 	 */
 	for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; ++i)
-		if (i != smp_processor_id())
+		if (cpu_online(i) && (i != smp_processor_id()))
 			cpu_data(i)->need_tlb_flush = 1;
 	local_flush_tlb_all();
 }

[-- Attachment #3: wrap_mmu_context-2.6.patch --]
[-- Type: Text/Plain, Size: 366 bytes --]

--- linux-2.6.0-test6.orig/arch/ia64/mm/tlb.c	Sun Sep 28 09:50:38 2003
+++ linux-2.6.0-test6/arch/ia64/mm/tlb.c	Wed Oct  8 17:58:42 2003
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@
 	{
 		int cpu = get_cpu(); /* prevent preemption/migration */
 		for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; ++i)
-			if (i != cpu)
+			if (cpu_online(i) && (i != cpu))
 				per_cpu(ia64_need_tlb_flush, i) = 1;
 		put_cpu();
 	}

  reply	other threads:[~2003-11-04  1:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-04  0:55 percpu data for non-existant cpus Jack Steiner
2003-11-04  1:43 ` Takayoshi Kochi [this message]
2003-11-04 23:04 ` Matthew Wilcox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-106791036330723@msgid-missing \
    --to=kochi@hpc.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox