From: Keith Owens <kaos@sgi.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Unwind bug on out of line code called from leaf functions
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 01:12:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-106989572025875@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-106989195923088@msgid-missing>
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 16:32:00 -0800,
David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 11:12:18 +1100, Keith Owens <kaos@sgi.com> said:
> Keith> We need a generic fix for unwinding through out of line code
> Keith> called from leaf functions and not using br.call. The
> Keith> obvious solution is to flag all out of line code with an
> Keith> unwind abi field and have the common unwind code reset
> Keith> ar.pfs. Can I use .unwabi 3, 'o' for out of line?
>
>The .unwabi directive isn't appropriate for that. If you want such a
>feature, please push it through the ABI committee to get it officially
>supported. I've said that before, I think.
I disagree, unwabi is exactly what we need for this. The out of line
code is peculiar to Linux, and uses the Linux pt_regs to get the real
ar.pfs. .unwabi 3,i indicates a Linux interrupt frame with all state
in pt_regs, .unwabi 3,o indicates a Linux out of line frame with
pt_regs.ar_pfs containing the real ar.pfs. If unwabi 3,i is valid then
so is unwabi 3,o.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-27 1:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-27 0:12 Unwind bug on out of line code called from leaf functions Keith Owens
2003-11-27 0:32 ` David Mosberger
2003-11-27 1:12 ` Keith Owens [this message]
2003-11-27 1:34 ` David Mosberger
2003-11-27 4:28 ` David Mosberger
2003-11-27 6:52 ` Jim Wilson
2003-12-11 1:21 ` David Mosberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-106989572025875@msgid-missing \
--to=kaos@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox