From: Bill Nottingham <notting@redhat.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [jakub@redhat.com: Re: [brian.j.vandecoevering@intel.com: RE: [Linux-ia64] problems with ppp/pppd: p
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 15:37:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-107124350029067@msgid-missing> (raw)
Back long ago, I reported a problem with PPP on ia64:
http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/linux-ia64/0105/1641.html
We added the workaround in our tree for earlier releases,
and promptly forgot about it; however, someone reported that
RHEL 3 has the same issue (as we took the workaround out.)
Jakub noticed the following - does this explain the problem?
Bill
----- Forwarded message from Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> -----
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: notting@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [brian.j.vandecoevering@intel.com: RE: [Linux-ia64] problems with ppp/pppd: put_user/copy_to_user]
Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 07:32:59 -0500
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 09:16:50PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 22:58:48 -0500
> Bill Nottingham <notting@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > According to Intel, this patch is *still* needed to fix ppp on
> > ia64 in RHEL3. We should probably verify this, although I'm
> > still at a loss as to why it works.
>
> Either a compiler problem or their put_user() implementation
> is busted.
The latter I guess.
At least linux-2.4.22-1.2108.nptl I have unpacked on my box
has in asm-ia64/uaccess.h:
#define put_user(x,ptr) __put_user_check((__typeof__(*(ptr)))(x),(ptr),sizeof(*(ptr)),get_fs())
#define __put_user_check(x,ptr,size,segment) \
({ \
register long __pu_err asm ("r8") = -EFAULT; \
__typeof__(*(ptr)) *__pu_addr = (ptr); \
if (__access_ok((long)__pu_addr,size,segment)) { \
__pu_err = 0; \
switch (size) { \
case 1: __put_user_8(x,__pu_addr); break; \
case 2: __put_user_16(x,__pu_addr); break; \
case 4: __put_user_32(x,__pu_addr); break; \
case 8: __put_user_64(x,__pu_addr); break; \
default: __put_user_unknown(); break; \
} \
} \
__pu_err; \
})
#define __put_user_32(x,addr) \
asm volatile ( \
"\n"_LL"\tst4 %1=%r2%P1\t// %0 gets overwritten by exception handler\n" \
"\t.xdata4 \"__ex_table\", @gprel(1b), @gprel(1f)\n" \
_LL \
: "=r"(__pu_err) : "m"(__m(addr)), "rO"(x), "0"(__pu_err))
But, a function call clobbers r8.
Guess a
__typeof(x) __x = (x);
before __pu_err and
s/x/__x/ is needed.
Probably __pu_addr decl should be moved before __pu_err is initialized too,
otherwise
extern int *foo ();
put_user (0, foo ());
might not work properly.
Jakub
----- End forwarded message -----
next reply other threads:[~2003-12-12 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-12 15:37 Bill Nottingham [this message]
2003-12-12 16:09 ` [jakub@redhat.com: Re: [brian.j.vandecoevering@intel.com: RE: [Linux-ia64] problems with ppp/ppp Bjorn Helgaas
2003-12-12 17:21 ` David Mosberger
2003-12-13 9:11 ` David Mosberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-107124350029067@msgid-missing \
--to=notting@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox