From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Piggin Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 14:57:09 +0000 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] 2.6.0-test11 sched_clock() broken for "drifty ITC" Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar wrote: > >So i believe the generic relaxing of sched_clock() synchronization is >the right thing to do. I like your patch. It adds minimal overhead and >solves a hard problem - nice work! Andrew, please apply it. > > Its a great looking patch if you must have high res sched_clock. So I guess I agree with it. Can we have a scheduler day when Andrew is ready to take patches for it? I have a few small changes that I'd like to get merged soon too (not sched domains - that should probably go to the mm tree for a while) Relevant patches are sched-ctx-count-preempt.patch sched-fork-cleanup.patch sched-migrate-comment.patch sched-style.patch sched-migrate-affinity-race.patch