From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 15:05:32 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] 2.6.0-test11 sched_clock() broken for "drifty ITC"
Message-Id: <marc-linux-ia64-107193274824314@msgid-missing>
List-Id: <linux-ia64.vger.kernel.org>
References: <marc-linux-ia64-107178053026093@msgid-missing>
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-107178053026093@msgid-missing>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org

Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> >
> >So i believe the generic relaxing of sched_clock() synchronization is
> >the right thing to do. I like your patch. It adds minimal overhead and
> >solves a hard problem - nice work! Andrew, please apply it.
> >
> >
> 
> Its a great looking patch if you must have high res sched_clock. So
> I guess I agree with it.

miaow ;)

> Can we have a scheduler day when Andrew is ready to take patches for
> it? I have a few small changes that I'd like to get merged soon too
> (not sched domains - that should probably go to the mm tree for a while)
> 
> Relevant patches are
> sched-ctx-count-preempt.patch
> sched-fork-cleanup.patch
> sched-migrate-comment.patch
> sched-style.patch
> sched-migrate-affinity-race.patch
> 

Post 'em.