From: "Gabor FUNK" <FUNK.Gabor@hunetkft.hu>
To: Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jim Paris <jim@jtan.com>, Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>,
Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: sata_sil24 stability and performance
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 10:39:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <005d01c87c4c$0d01f550$4d0fa8c0@M2007> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20080302061453.GA7291@denix.org
I have/had a similar (hard resetting) problem (2+8 disks, kernel 2.6.24),
see thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-ide@vger.kernel.org/msg15950.html
I tried replacing the PSU and also run the system with two 650W PSU-s,
also failed. I also think that PSU shouldn't be the problem as I see they
eat much less in operation than at spinup.
Now I replaced the MB and it runs with a different Gigabyte MB with
the 8 disk in SW RAID6 connected to the 2*4 on board SATA
connectors (these now use 2+4*ata_piix and 2 ahci kernel drivers)
and the 2 system disk is on an add-on Silicon Image SiI 3512 card.
Since the problem is not seen immediately I can't tell whether it is
better now. It is running cp 1 2, cp 2 3... to 2500 or so, with 1GB
files then md5sums them, so far the problem not exhibiting. The
1st copy didn't finish in a day, so accidentally a second one got
started (cron) and yesterday an "md: data-check" also started, so
the system is quite busy now doing disk reads/writes...
G.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Denys Dmytriyenko" <denis@denix.org>
To: <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Jim Paris" <jim@jtan.com>; "Mark Lord" <liml@rtr.ca>
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2008 7:14 AM
Subject: Re: sata_sil24 stability and performance
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 10:32:07AM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
>> Jim Paris wrote:
>>> ..
>>> As you may have noticed on this list, power supplies are very
>>> frequently a problem.
>> ..
>>
>> Actually, no, I haven't noticed that. :)
>>
>> I do see them more frequently being suggested as a possible problem,
>> and then after some time and expense on the part of the reporters
>> it nearly always turns out to have been a device driver bug,
>> or (less often) a firmware quirk of the device.
>>
>> Yes, PSUs are often suggested as a problem here,
>> but only rarely has that been true.
>>
>> Especially nowadays, as PSUs are becoming much larger than
>> they historically once were.
>
> Hi again. Thanks for your replies and sorry for bringing this up again.
> I am still trying to resolve those 2 issues I mentioned in the first
> email. While playing with different power options lately, I decided to
> replace the PSU again for a single-rail Silencer 750 EPS12V, which is
> rated at 60A (!) for a single 12V rail. Does anybody have any experience
> with it? Can anyone suggest anything better?
>
> That is assuming the first issue with exceptions and resets is due to
> the power being maxed out...
>
> Meanwhile I would still like to resolve the low performance issue with
> SiI 3124, which shows only 17 MB/s write speed doing "dd if=/dev/zero",
> while Intel ICH7 based PC writes at 44 MB/s sustained rate. I'd really
> appreciate any ideas/suggestions towards solving this issue. Please let
> me know if any other information is needed. I'm attaching the original
> email with logs. Thanks in advance!
>
> --
> Denys
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-02 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-19 2:09 sata_sil24 stability and performance Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-02-19 4:36 ` Jim Paris
2008-02-19 6:39 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-02-19 15:32 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-02 6:14 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-03-02 9:39 ` Gabor FUNK [this message]
2008-03-04 0:02 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-04 0:22 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-03-04 3:28 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-04 6:29 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-03-05 8:11 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-06 4:14 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-03-06 4:25 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-06 6:55 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-03-06 7:08 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-15 21:43 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-03-17 3:09 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-18 0:15 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-03-18 4:09 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-18 4:53 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-03-18 6:40 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-20 22:37 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-03-21 0:18 ` Tejun Heo
2008-04-14 1:19 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2008-04-14 2:49 ` Tejun Heo
2008-04-14 10:55 ` Gabor FUNK
2008-03-18 9:14 ` Gabor FUNK
2008-03-18 13:06 ` Gabor FUNK
2008-03-18 20:05 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-18 20:06 ` Mark Lord
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='005d01c87c4c$0d01f550$4d0fa8c0@M2007' \
--to=funk.gabor@hunetkft.hu \
--cc=denis@denix.org \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jim@jtan.com \
--cc=liml@rtr.ca \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).