From: fcp <fcp@pop.co.za>
To: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PDC202XX_OLD regression between 2.6 and 2.4
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 08:26:05 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1079087165.2767.40.camel@server> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040311190100.GV19928@iwoars.net>
I have several 20262 cards and the dma doesn't appear to work in 2.6 as
well.
The system in question has an IBM EIDE drive and three Sony 48x cd
writers. With the hard drive + cdr on the first mainboard controller and
the other two cdrs on the second mainboard controller, I can use all
three cdrs at the same time but barely. One would expect performance
problems due to the configuration. This is with kernel 2.6.1. 2.6.2+
doesn't work in this configuration. Something must have changed that
affects performance.
With the cdrs each on its own 20262 controller channel it simply doesn't
work. It looks like the dma features are hardwired disabled to me as
setting the dma on doesn't do it.
L. Baker
On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 17:01, Thomas Themel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently trying to set up a system that contains a Promise 20267
> controller, and it seems that DMA on that controller causes problems in
> 2.6.
>
> My test case consists of simply creating an empty ext3 file system and
> running bonnie++ on it. In 2.4.25, this works as expected. In 2.6.3-rc4,
> however, it breaks after a few seconds:
>
> Mar 11 17:27:19 sophokles kernel: hdg: dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0x60
> Mar 11 17:27:19 sophokles kernel: hdg: DMA timeout retry
> Mar 11 17:27:19 sophokles kernel: PDC202XX: Secondary channel reset.
> Mar 11 17:27:19 sophokles kernel: PDC202XX: Primary channel reset.
> Mar 11 17:27:19 sophokles kernel: hdg: timeout waiting for DMA
> Mar 11 17:27:40 sophokles kernel: hdg: dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0x60
> Mar 11 17:27:40 sophokles kernel: hdg: DMA timeout retry
> Mar 11 17:27:40 sophokles kernel: PDC202XX: Secondary channel reset.
> Mar 11 17:27:40 sophokles kernel: PDC202XX: Primary channel reset.
> Mar 11 17:27:40 sophokles kernel: hdg: timeout waiting for DMA
> Mar 11 17:28:02 sophokles kernel: hdg: dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0x60
> Mar 11 17:28:02 sophokles kernel: hdg: DMA timeout retry
> Mar 11 17:28:02 sophokles kernel: PDC202XX: Secondary channel reset.
> Mar 11 17:28:02 sophokles kernel: PDC202XX: Primary channel reset.
> Mar 11 17:28:02 sophokles kernel: hdg: timeout waiting for DMA
> Mar 11 17:28:22 sophokles kernel: hdg: dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0x60
> Mar 11 17:28:22 sophokles kernel: hdg: DMA timeout retry
> Mar 11 17:28:22 sophokles kernel: PDC202XX: Secondary channel reset.
> Mar 11 17:28:22 sophokles kernel: PDC202XX: Primary channel reset.
> Mar 11 17:28:22 sophokles kernel: hdg: timeout waiting for DMA
>
> Other information:
>
> hdparm output is slightly different between 2.4 and 2.6 (hda is an
> identical drive on a vt8233a controller on the motherboard) -
>
> sophokles:~# diff -Nrua 2.4.25/ 2.6.4-rc3/
> diff -Nrua 2.4.25/hda 2.6.4-rc3/hda
> --- 2.4.25/hda 2004-03-11 19:48:29.000000000 +0100
> +++ 2.6.4-rc3/hda 2004-03-11 19:52:28.000000000 +0100
> @@ -6,5 +6,5 @@
> using_dma = 1 (on)
> keepsettings = 0 (off)
> readonly = 0 (off)
> - readahead = 8 (on)
> - geometry = 14593/255/63, sectors = 234441648, start = 0
> + readahead = 256 (on)
> + geometry = 16383/255/63, sectors = 234441648, start = 0
> diff -Nrua 2.4.25/hdg 2.6.4-rc3/hdg
> --- 2.4.25/hdg 2004-03-11 19:48:32.000000000 +0100
> +++ 2.6.4-rc3/hdg 2004-03-11 19:52:31.000000000 +0100
> @@ -6,5 +6,5 @@
> using_dma = 1 (on)
> keepsettings = 0 (off)
> readonly = 0 (off)
> - readahead = 8 (on)
> - geometry = 14593/255/63, sectors = 234441648, start = 0
> + readahead = 256 (on)
> + geometry = 16383/255/63, sectors = 234441648, start = 0
>
> I am a bit confused by the geometry changes, but they can hardly
> cause the problem since hda works nicely under 2.6.
>
> Can I do anything to narrow this down, is there a way to get more
> debugging output?
>
> PS: Is there an archive of this mailing list somewhere?
>
> ciao,
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-12 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-11 19:01 PDC202XX_OLD regression between 2.6 and 2.4 Thomas Themel
2004-03-12 10:26 ` fcp [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1079087165.2767.40.camel@server \
--to=fcp@pop.co.za \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).