From: Ryan Geoffrey Bourgeois <rgb005@latech.edu>
To: Konstantin Sobolev <kos@supportwizard.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: poor sata performance on 2.6
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 22:54:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1082001287.407e0787f3c48@webmail.LaTech.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200404150236.05894.kos@supportwizard.com>
Quoting Konstantin Sobolev <kos@supportwizard.com>:
> /dev/hde:
> Timing buffer-cache reads: 1436 MB in 2.00 seconds = 717.03 MB/sec
> Timing buffered disk reads: 100 MB in 3.03 seconds = 32.95 MB/sec
>
> for sata_sil:
>
> /dev/sda:
> Timing buffer-cache reads: 1412 MB in 2.00 seconds = 705.05 MB/sec
> Timing buffered disk reads: 84 MB in 3.06 seconds = 27.43 MB/sec
>
> So my old IDE HDD appears to be considerably faster. Expected results were
> 55-70MB/s.
Which kernel version did you get these results using? Have you speed-tested the
drive(s) on a different SATA controller? I don't mean to imply that you should
buy another one - that would be rediculuous since your motherboard should
laready has it - but it would help to eliminate possible causes of error. I
took the same readings on my machine. I'm using an ASUS SK8N motherboard -
that's the Promise TX2 SATA controller - with Western Digital's 36gb 10K RPM
Raptor:
/dev/sda:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.12 seconds =1075.79 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.20 seconds = 53.43 MB/sec
I'm using the latest stable vanilla kernel (2.6.5), compiled today. It would
also help to have your kernel config, if at all possible.
-Ryan
-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-15 3:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-14 22:36 poor sata performance on 2.6 Konstantin Sobolev
2004-04-15 3:54 ` Ryan Geoffrey Bourgeois [this message]
2004-04-15 10:55 ` Konstantin Sobolev
2004-04-15 12:02 ` Justin Cormack
2004-04-15 13:34 ` Konstantin Sobolev
2004-04-15 14:00 ` Justin Cormack
2004-04-15 14:26 ` Konstantin Sobolev
2004-04-15 14:33 ` Justin Cormack
2004-04-15 14:48 ` Konstantin Sobolev
2004-04-15 14:52 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-04-15 15:08 ` Justin Cormack
2004-04-15 15:16 ` Konstantin Sobolev
2004-04-23 4:50 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-04-15 17:30 ` Denis Vlasenko
2004-04-16 1:05 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-04-16 14:48 ` Denis Vlasenko
2004-04-16 16:59 ` Konstantin Sobolev
2004-04-16 17:46 ` cira
2004-04-20 12:41 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-04-15 15:51 ` Ryan Geoffrey Bourgeois
2004-04-15 23:34 ` Simon Koch
2004-04-16 0:11 ` poor sata performance on 2.6 - Promise SX4 Ryan Geoffrey Bourgeois
2004-04-16 1:03 ` poor sata performance on 2.6 Jeff Garzik
2004-04-15 7:12 ` Lenar Lõhmus
2004-04-15 10:40 ` Konstantin Sobolev
2004-04-15 12:37 ` Denis Vlasenko
2004-04-15 13:05 ` Konstantin Sobolev
2004-04-15 19:50 ` Pavel Machek
2004-04-15 21:13 ` Konstantin Sobolev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1082001287.407e0787f3c48@webmail.LaTech.edu \
--to=rgb005@latech.edu \
--cc=kos@supportwizard.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).