From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Cox Subject: Re: CSB5 IDE does not fully support native mode?? Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 18:22:03 +0100 Message-ID: <1117128122.5743.158.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <200505242026.DJT32107@ms3.netsolmail.com> <1117117463.5743.149.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200505261055.38137.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from clock-tower.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:40113 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261655AbVEZRYX (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 May 2005 13:24:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200505261055.38137.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: evt@texelsoft.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Iau, 2005-05-26 at 17:55, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > This has been niggling in my mind for a while -- in legacy mode, > the device should use IRQ 14/15. But I think we still call > pci_enable_device(), which sets up IRQ routing according to > the usual PCI rules. Should we be using pci_enable_device() > at all in legacy mode? For all the other enables yes. The IRQ is an interesting case and I'd have to look into the newer code to even guess - Bartlomiej has probably has a much better idea as maintainer.