From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [git patches] IDE update Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 15:21:47 +0100 Message-ID: <1121091705.7434.66.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20050705101414.GB18504@suse.de> <42CA5EAD.7070005@rainbow-software.org> <20050705104208.GA20620@suse.de> <42CA7EA9.1010409@rainbow-software.org> <1120567900.12942.8.camel@linux> <42CA84DB.2050506@rainbow-software.org> <1120569095.12942.11.camel@linux> <42CAAC7D.2050604@rainbow-software.org> <20050705142122.GY1444@suse.de> <20050705191448.GB30235@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20050705191448.GB30235@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jens Axboe Cc: Linus Torvalds , Ondrej Zary , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Tomt , Al Boldi , 'Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz' , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Maw, 2005-07-05 at 20:14, Jens Axboe wrote: > IDE still has much lower overhead per command than your average SCSI > hardware. SATA with FIS even improves on this, definitely a good thing! But SCSI overlaps them while in PATA they are dead time. Thats why PATA is so demanding of large I/O block sizes