From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
list linux-ide <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: IDE issues with "choose_drive"
Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 11:15:03 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1128734104.17365.73.camel@gaston> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1128560569.22073.25.camel@gaston>
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 11:02 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > The first one is the one I'm trying to fix, it's basically a hang on
> > wakeup from sleep. What happens is that both drives are blocked
> > (suspended, drive->blocked is set). Their IO queues contains some
> > requests that haven't been serviced yet. We receive the resume()
> > callback for one of them. We react by inserting a wakeup request at the
> > head of the queue and waiting for it to complete. However, when we reach
> > ide_do_request(), choose_drive() may return the other drive (the one
> > that is still sleeping). In this case, we hit the test for blocked queue
> > and just break out of the loop. We end up never servicing the other
> > drive queue which is the one we are trying to wakeup, thus we hang.
>
> Oh, and here's the ugly workaround beeing tested by the users who are
> having the problem so far. Not really a proper fix though...
No reply ... it's a bit urgent as it may bite any system trying to
suspend with a slave IDE disk at least (not including the other possible
problems I've spotted with this code).
I'm tempted to just send my workaround patch to Linus & Andrew (might
still make it into 2.6.14). That would at least fix the bug with resume
from sleep. What do you think ?
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-08 1:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-06 0:36 IDE issues with "choose_drive" Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-10-06 1:02 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-10-08 1:15 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2005-10-08 8:29 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-10-08 22:18 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1128734104.17365.73.camel@gaston \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).