linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Erik Slagter <erik@slagter.name>
To: Mark Hahn <hahn@physics.mcmaster.ca>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Problems with Promise SATAII TX4
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 12:29:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1128940153.4775.48.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0510081259090.28615-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1226 bytes --]

On Sat, 2005-10-08 at 13:06 -0400, Mark Hahn wrote:
> > I'm not sure why the system needs more than 430W, but with the new
> 
> unfortunately, total watts is inadequate for characterizing a PSU.
> it's about like classifying cars by how tall they are.
> 
> in particular, many non-server higher-watt PSU's are designed to provide
> extra power for systems which consume power mainly on the CPU/video voltages,
> and may not provide enough power for disks.  further, modern motherboards
> have voltage converters for the CPU and video which are less sensitive 
> to power quality, and will thus "brownout" some power buses.  after all, 
> a typical CPU wants 1.5V or so at an obscene current.  disk electronics, 
> as far as I have seen, tend to treat their supply as clean and regulated.

BTW my system has a 300W PSU but consumes about 195W according to a
power meter on the primary (230V) side. Which of course is only
comparable up to a certain level.

Also BTW note that besides a total max power, PSU's also have ratings
per voltage and some even per outlet. Maybe that's where the pain comes
from ;-)

A nice "bogus power" error message in the (S)ATA standard would have
been ehrm... beneficial.

[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 2115 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2005-10-10 10:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-30  0:10 Problems with Promise SATAII TX4 Kim Roland Rasmussen
2005-03-31 20:34 ` Joe Harvell
2005-08-18  3:46 ` Fabian Knittel
2005-08-23 12:58   ` Fabian Knittel
2005-10-08 13:12     ` Fabian Knittel
2005-10-08 17:06       ` Mark Hahn
2005-10-10 10:29         ` Erik Slagter [this message]
2005-10-10 10:23       ` Erik Slagter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1128940153.4775.48.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=erik@slagter.name \
    --cc=hahn@physics.mcmaster.ca \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).