linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
To: Matthew Dharm <mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.net>
Cc: Timothy Thelin <Timothy.Thelin@wdc.com>,
	t.schorpp@gmx.de, usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux SCSI list <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [usb-storage] [Merging ATA passthru] on integrating SMART/ATA-Security in usb-storage driver
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 23:08:07 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1131077287.3117.22.camel@mulgrave> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051102234532.GC26148@one-eyed-alien.net>

On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 15:45 -0800, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 02:18:52PM -0800, Timothy Thelin wrote:
> > 
> > If you had time to spare, instead of touching usb-storage,
> > it might be better spent resurecting SG_FLAG_LUN_INHIBIT to
> > stop the above behavior so that SG_IO cdbs can be passed
> > through untouched.
> > (SG_FLAG_FUN_INHIBIT was a flag SG_IO used to support a long
> > time ago, and I have no idea why it was dropped, but it was)
> 
> I didn't realize that had been removed.  Anyone that sends a
> vendor-specific command to a device needs this flag to make sure it goes
> through unmangled.
> 
> Perhaps someone on linux-scsi can comment on why this was removed and how
> we might get it back?

I've no distinct recollection of someone removing this, but if I
remember correctly what it used to do, it was a hack to stop us from
mangling SCSI-3 CDB's.  We fixed the mid-layer not to require the hack
by only setting the CDB[1] lun field for SCSI-1 and SCSI-2 devices (as
the standards mandate).  What's the actual problem?  No SCSI-1 or SCSI-2
device should have any vendor specific CDBs that uses these bits in
CDB[1].

James



  reply	other threads:[~2005-11-04 15:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-02 22:18 [usb-storage] [Merging ATA passthru] on integrating SMART/ATA-Security in usb-storage driver Timothy Thelin
2005-11-02 23:22 ` thomas schorpp
2005-11-02 23:45 ` Matthew Dharm
2005-11-04  4:08   ` James Bottomley [this message]
2005-11-04 17:28     ` Matthew Dharm
2005-11-04 18:33       ` James Bottomley
2005-11-04 20:30         ` Matthew Dharm
2005-11-04 20:53           ` James Bottomley
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-08 19:50 Timothy Thelin
2005-11-09  9:04 ` thomas schorpp
2005-11-09  9:45   ` thomas schorpp
2005-11-09 10:05     ` thomas schorpp
2005-11-09 13:21     ` Mark Lord
2005-11-09 14:05       ` thomas schorpp
2005-11-07 20:18 Timothy Thelin
2005-11-07 17:51 Timothy Thelin
2005-11-04 18:30 Timothy Thelin
2005-11-04 18:58 ` James Bottomley
2005-11-04 20:30   ` Matthew Dharm
2005-11-04 20:49     ` James Bottomley
2005-11-05 23:55       ` Matthew Dharm
2005-11-06  0:49         ` James Bottomley
2005-11-06  3:38           ` thomas schorpp
2005-11-06 21:58           ` Matthew Dharm
2005-11-06 22:28             ` thomas schorpp
2005-11-06 23:52               ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-11-07 16:59                 ` Matthew Dharm
2005-11-07 17:05                 ` Matthew Dharm
2005-11-07 17:24                   ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-11-07 17:46                     ` Alan Stern
2005-11-07 18:06                       ` thomas schorpp
2005-11-07 19:33                         ` Alan Stern
2005-11-07 20:07                           ` thomas schorpp
2005-11-07 17:53                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-11-07 17:54                     ` thomas schorpp
2005-11-07 18:57                       ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-11-07 19:53                         ` Alan Stern
2005-11-07 20:47                           ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-11-07 20:59                             ` Alan Stern
2005-11-07 22:05                               ` James Bottomley
2005-11-08 17:09                                 ` Alan Stern
2005-11-08 23:05                                   ` Mike Anderson
2005-11-09 15:35                                     ` Alan Stern
2005-11-06 23:15             ` James Bottomley
2005-11-07 18:14         ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-11-04 23:56     ` Andries Brouwer
2005-11-04 23:46 ` Pete Zaitcev
2005-11-05 16:20   ` thomas schorpp
2005-11-02 20:33 Timothy Thelin
2005-11-02 21:55 ` thomas schorpp
2005-11-02 14:08 thomas schorpp
2005-11-02 16:05 ` [usb-storage] " Alan Stern
2005-11-02 19:12   ` thomas schorpp
2005-11-02 19:26     ` Alan Stern
2005-11-02 20:41       ` thomas schorpp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1131077287.3117.22.camel@mulgrave \
    --to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=Timothy.Thelin@wdc.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.net \
    --cc=t.schorpp@gmx.de \
    --cc=usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).