Re: [usb-storage] [Merging ATA passthru] on integrating SMART/ATA-Security in usb-storage driver

[James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>]

On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 09:28 -0800, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> > I've no distinct recollection of someone removing this, but if I
> > remember correctly what it used to do, it was a hack to stop us from
> > mangling SCSI-3 CDB's.  We fixed the mid-layer not to require the hack
> > by only setting the CDB[1] lun field for SCSI-1 and SCSI-2 devices (as
> > the standards mandate).  What's the actual problem?  No SCSI-1 or SCSI-2
> > device should have any vendor specific CDBs that uses these bits in
> > CDB[1].
> 
> Unfortunately, reality appears to disagree with the last "should".  I've
> personally seen devices with vendor-specific commands that want to control
> CDB[1] in SCSI-2.

Which device and command?  It isn't some vendor who screwed up SCSI-3
compliance and then decided to "fix" it by only claiming SCSI-2, is it?

> I didn't know it was removed; I only know what Timothy Thelin told me.  Can
> we get the feature back?

Not at all easily ... changes to support it would have to thread through
several structures in both the block layer and the scsi subsystem.

James