From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: jgarzik@pobox.com, albertcc@tw.ibm.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Cc: htejun@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCHSET] libata: various fixes related to EH, take #4
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:10:48 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <11395518482722-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To:
Hello, Jeff.
This patchset is the fourth take of 'various fixes related to EH'
patchset. From the previous take[1], %01 and %02 made into the tree
and %03 got nacked and #04 acked but didn't make into the tree due to
dependency to %03. (% denotes patch numbers in the previous take, #
in this take)
Changes from the last take.
* %03 reimplemented using sht->eh_timed_out() callback as Jeff
suggested[2].
* assert(ata_qc_from_tag(ap, ap->active_tag)) is added to
ata_scsi_error() in patch %04.
This patchset contains the following patches.
#01-03 : implement and use ata_scsi_timed_out()
#04 : kill NULL qc handling and add above described assertion
I used ATA_QCFLAG_EH_SCHEDULED instead of ATA_QCFLAG_TIMEOUT because
the same flag will be used later by EH patchset in the same manner.
Simulated the following three cases and all work fine.
* normal time out
* timeout wins, but qc completion kicks in before EH
* timeout loses (ata_scsi_timed_out() returns EH_HANDLED)
Thanks.
--
tejun
[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/7788
[2] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/7890
next reply other threads:[~2006-02-10 6:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-10 6:10 Tejun Heo [this message]
2006-02-10 6:10 ` [PATCH 2/4] libata: implement ata_scsi_timed_out() Tejun Heo
2006-02-10 6:10 ` [PATCH 4/4] libata: kill NULL qc handling from ->eng_timeout callbacks Tejun Heo
2006-02-10 6:10 ` [PATCH 3/4] libata: use ata_scsi_timed_out() Tejun Heo
2006-02-10 6:10 ` [PATCH 1/4] libata: add ATA_QCFLAG_EH_SCHEDULED Tejun Heo
2006-02-10 12:00 ` [PATCHSET] libata: various fixes related to EH, take #4 Jeff Garzik
2006-02-10 12:16 ` Tejun Heo
2006-02-11 6:13 ` [PATCH] libata: inline ata_qc_complete() Tejun Heo
2006-02-11 22:53 ` Jeff Garzik
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-02-10 14:58 [PATCHSET] libata: various fixes related to EH, take #4 Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=11395518482722-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=albertcc@tw.ibm.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).