From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] sata_sil: convert to new EH Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 18:16:35 +0100 Message-ID: <1147367796.26130.77.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <11473536881889-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com> <1147357322.26130.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> <44634CB6.80804@gmail.com> <1147362385.26130.42.camel@localhost.localdomain> <44635C29.6080903@gmail.com> <1147363974.26130.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> <446361F3.4040505@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:20973 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030372AbWEKRGd (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 May 2006 13:06:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <446361F3.4040505@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com, axboe@suse.de, albertcc@tw.ibm.com, forrest.zhao@intel.com, efalk@google.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Gwe, 2006-05-12 at 01:10 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > > documented) to drop any pending interrupt once it is masked, thus you > > would take the interrupt once (or maybe 2 or 3 times in weird obscure > > corner cases on a pentium II SMP box) and then no more. > > So, they will drop interrupt after several unhandled IRQs at most even > if the driver doesn't read TF status register to clear it, right? Yes. The IRQ is no longer asserted at source so will not be re-triggered