From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "zhao, forrest" Subject: Re: State of resume for AHCI? Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 14:03:24 +0800 Message-ID: <1149228204.13451.8.camel@forrest26.sh.intel.com> References: <447F23C2.8030802@goop.org> <447F3250.5070101@rtr.ca> <20060601183904.GR4400@suse.de> <447F4BC2.8060808@goop.org> <20060602060323.GS4400@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:47446 "EHLO azsmga101-1.ch.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751092AbWFBGPV (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jun 2006 02:15:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20060602060323.GS4400@suse.de> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Jens Axboe Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Mark Lord , Jeff Garzik , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Hannes Reinecke , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 08:03 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Thu, Jun 01 2006, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > > Jens Axboe wrote: > > >It's a lot more complicated than that, I'm afraid. ahci doesn't even > > >have the resume/suspend methods defined, plus it needs more work than > > >piix on resume. > > > > > Hannes Reinecke's patch implements those functions, basically by > > factoring out the shutdown and init code and calling them at > > suspend/resume time as well. > > > > Is that correct/sufficient? Or should something else be happening? > > No that's it, I know for a fact that suspend/resume works perfectly with > the 10.1 suse kernel. You can give that a shot, if you want. You may mean the Hannes's patch for 10.1 SUSE kernel. Hannes's patch posted in open source community(or in linux-ide mailing list) didn't work. Forrest