From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Cox Subject: Re: + via-pata-controller-xfer-fixes.patch added to -mm tree Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 11:03:23 +0100 Message-ID: <1151661803.31392.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <200606242214.k5OMEHCU005963@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <449DBE88.5020809@garzik.org> <449DBFFD.2010700@garzik.org> <449E5445.60008@free.fr> <44A4CE21.30009@tw.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:4252 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932231AbWF3JsR (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jun 2006 05:48:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <44A4CE21.30009@tw.ibm.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: albertl@mail.com Cc: matthieu castet , Jeff Garzik , akpm@osdl.org, "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" , B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl, htejun@gmail.com, Linux Kernel , Unicorn Chang , Doug Maxey Ar Gwe, 2006-06-30 am 15:09 +0800, ysgrifennodd Albert Lee: > If it is the problem of the specific ATAPI device, all controllers > should be affected, not only VIA. So, strange not seeing the problem on > Promise. That may be because of the way the chips handle buffering of interrupt delivery and readahead/writebehind. I have two traces on the ALi chipsets that look like the delayed response problem.