From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] ide_end_drive_cmd(): avoid instruction pipeline stall Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 19:21:39 +0100 Message-ID: <1151691699.31392.72.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20060630161351.GA17434@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de> <1151688416.31392.66.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060630110018.f45b40e2.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:197 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932626AbWF3SFI (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jun 2006 14:05:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20060630110018.f45b40e2.akpm@osdl.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: andi@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de, B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ar Gwe, 2006-06-30 am 11:00 -0700, ysgrifennodd Andrew Morton: > I guess because he was profiling for IFU_MEM_STALL, not for wall-time. > > > NAK because > > 1. This is a gcc problem > > 2. Not everyone is using an intel x86-32 box which has such problems > > 3. IDE is in life-support mode and the relatives are already planning > > the flowers. > > Well. If the patch breaks anything we can dine on hats for a month. Seems > pretty inoffensive to me. Yeah its a do nothing change that has no value. We can equally not apply it and see no difference. Its make-work that might slow down some systems. Send it to the gcc people see if its a case they could/should optimise Alan