From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: jgarzik@pobox.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/9] libata: implement per-dev xfermask
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:16:29 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <11551977893543-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11551977882917-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com>
Implement per-dev xfermask. libata used to determine xfermask
per-port - the fastest mode of the slowest device on the port. This
patch enables per-dev xfermask.
Original patch is from Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>. The following
changes are made by me.
* simplex warning message is added
* remove disabled device handling code which is never invoked
(originally for choosing port-wide lowest PIO mode)
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
---
drivers/scsi/libata-core.c | 40 +++++++++++-----------------------------
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
37deecb5139ee431233781a9a093d9fcaab54c5b
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c b/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c
index 38fc75d..4e6c2e8 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c
@@ -3040,10 +3040,6 @@ static int ata_dma_blacklisted(const str
* known limits including host controller limits, device
* blacklist, etc...
*
- * FIXME: The current implementation limits all transfer modes to
- * the fastest of the lowested device on the port. This is not
- * required on most controllers.
- *
* LOCKING:
* None.
*/
@@ -3052,8 +3048,8 @@ static void ata_dev_xfermask(struct ata_
struct ata_port *ap = dev->ap;
struct ata_host_set *hs = ap->host_set;
unsigned long xfer_mask;
- int i;
+ /* controller modes available */
xfer_mask = ata_pack_xfermask(ap->pio_mask,
ap->mwdma_mask, ap->udma_mask);
@@ -3063,34 +3059,20 @@ static void ata_dev_xfermask(struct ata_
if (ap->cbl == ATA_CBL_PATA40)
xfer_mask &= ~(0xF8 << ATA_SHIFT_UDMA);
- /* FIXME: Use port-wide xfermask for now */
- for (i = 0; i < ATA_MAX_DEVICES; i++) {
- struct ata_device *d = &ap->device[i];
-
- if (ata_dev_absent(d))
- continue;
+ xfer_mask &= ata_pack_xfermask(dev->pio_mask,
+ dev->mwdma_mask, dev->udma_mask);
+ xfer_mask &= ata_id_xfermask(dev->id);
- if (ata_dev_disabled(d)) {
- /* to avoid violating device selection timing */
- xfer_mask &= ata_pack_xfermask(d->pio_mask,
- UINT_MAX, UINT_MAX);
- continue;
- }
-
- xfer_mask &= ata_pack_xfermask(d->pio_mask,
- d->mwdma_mask, d->udma_mask);
- xfer_mask &= ata_id_xfermask(d->id);
- if (ata_dma_blacklisted(d))
- xfer_mask &= ~(ATA_MASK_MWDMA | ATA_MASK_UDMA);
- }
-
- if (ata_dma_blacklisted(dev))
+ if (ata_dma_blacklisted(dev)) {
+ xfer_mask &= ~(ATA_MASK_MWDMA | ATA_MASK_UDMA);
ata_dev_printk(dev, KERN_WARNING,
"device is on DMA blacklist, disabling DMA\n");
+ }
- if (hs->flags & ATA_HOST_SIMPLEX) {
- if (hs->simplex_claimed)
- xfer_mask &= ~(ATA_MASK_MWDMA | ATA_MASK_UDMA);
+ if ((hs->flags & ATA_HOST_SIMPLEX) && hs->simplex_claimed) {
+ xfer_mask &= ~(ATA_MASK_MWDMA | ATA_MASK_UDMA);
+ ata_dev_printk(dev, KERN_WARNING, "simplex DMA is claimed by "
+ "other device, disabling DMA\n");
}
if (ap->ops->mode_filter)
--
1.3.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-10 8:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-10 8:16 [PATCHSET] libata: improve initialization and legacy handling, take#3 Tejun Heo
2006-08-10 8:16 ` [PATCH 2/9] [libata] some function renaming Tejun Heo
2006-08-10 8:16 ` [PATCH 1/9] libata: update ata_host_init() and rename it to ata_port_init_shost() Tejun Heo
2006-08-10 8:16 ` [PATCH 5/9] libata: rework legacy handling to remove much of the cruft Tejun Heo
2006-08-10 8:16 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2006-08-10 8:16 ` [PATCH 6/9] libata: implement dummy port Tejun Heo
2006-08-10 8:16 ` [PATCH 3/9] [libata] Kill 'count' var in ata_device_add() Tejun Heo
2006-08-10 8:16 ` [PATCH 8/9] libata: replace ap->hard_port_no with ap->port_no Tejun Heo
2006-08-10 8:16 ` [PATCH 9/9] libata: kill unused hard_port_no and legacy_mode Tejun Heo
2006-08-10 8:16 ` [PATCH 7/9] libata: use dummy port for stolen legacy ports Tejun Heo
2006-08-10 10:53 ` [PATCHSET] libata: improve initialization and legacy handling, take#3 Jeff Garzik
2006-08-10 11:32 ` Tejun Heo
2006-08-10 11:59 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=11551977893543-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).