From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Cox Subject: Re: What's in libata-dev.git Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 17:26:37 +0100 Message-ID: <1157991998.23085.164.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20060911132250.GA5178@havoc.gtf.org> <45056627.7030202@ru.mvista.com> <450566A2.1090009@garzik.org> <450568F3.3020005@ru.mvista.com> <1157986974.23085.147.camel@localhost.localdomain> <45057651.8000404@garzik.org> <1157988513.23085.159.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060911153706.GE4955@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:8159 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964947AbWIKQE0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Sep 2006 12:04:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20060911153706.GE4955@suse.de> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Jens Axboe Cc: Jeff Garzik , Sergei Shtylyov , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds Ar Llu, 2006-09-11 am 17:37 +0200, ysgrifennodd Jens Axboe: > On Mon, Sep 11 2006, Alan Cox wrote: > > sometimes. The IBM's abort the xfer but the maxtors may or may not get > > it right (its as if half the firmware has the right test). > > So this is a confirmed, broken case? Why has no one complained for 2.4 > and 2.6? They did and proposed patches. Alan