From: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@linuxmail.org>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Klaus Knopper <knopper@knopper.net>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@gmail.com>,
gregkh@suse.de, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
discuss@x86-64.org, Thierry Vignaud <tvignaud@mandriva.com>,
jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@mellanox.co.il>,
len.brown@intel.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc1: known regressions
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 17:16:40 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1160032600.7086.4.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061005042816.GD16812@stusta.de>
Hi.
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 06:28 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Contrary to popular belief, there are people who test -rc kernels
> and report bugs.
>
> And there are even people who test -git kernels.
Slightly off topic, but let me report a "metoo" as far as testing -git
goes (you can even find a suspend2-against-current-git tree on
kernel.org now!), and some positive progress: for the first time in
months, I'm reliably suspending and resuming my amd64 based laptop. I
don't have an exact cause, but would guess at Andi's multitude of
patches and/or any cpufreq fixes that might have slid in there too. It's
been really strange writing software that others can use reliably, and
not being able to reliably use it yourself! Kudos to all the authors of
suspend/resume bug fixes that have gone in!
Nigel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-05 7:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.64.0610042017340.3952@g5.osdl.org>
2006-10-05 4:28 ` 2.6.19-rc1: known regressions Adrian Bunk
2006-10-05 7:16 ` Nigel Cunningham [this message]
2006-10-05 8:27 ` [patch] x86, fix rwsem build bug on CONFIG_M386=y Ingo Molnar
2006-10-05 9:41 ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2006-10-07 21:46 ` 2.6.19-rc1: known regressions (v2) Adrian Bunk
2006-10-08 8:56 ` matthieu castet
2006-10-10 5:10 ` 2.6.19-rc1: known regressions (v3) Adrian Bunk
2006-10-10 22:58 ` Paul Mackerras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1160032600.7086.4.camel@nigel.suspend2.net \
--to=ncunningham@linuxmail.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=knopper@knopper.net \
--cc=kronos.it@gmail.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=mst@mellanox.co.il \
--cc=olaf@aepfle.de \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=tvignaud@mandriva.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).