From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: jeff@garzik.org, mjg59@srcf.ucam.org, rdunlap@xenotime.net,
alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, forrest.zhao@gmail.com,
lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, hare@suse.de,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, htejun@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCHSET] libata: improve ATA ACPI support, take#2
Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 23:50:37 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <11783766373569-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To:
Hello, all.
This is the second take of improve-ATA-ACPI-support patchset. Changes
from the last take[L] are...
* s/atadev/dev/
* s/do_drive_get_GTF/ata_dev_get_GTF/
* s/do_drive_set_taskfiles/ata_dev_set_taskfiles/
As I wrote in the previous thread, I don't think automatically
matching ACPI nodes to ATA ports and devices is a good idea or can be
done safely, so I left that part alone. If you've got better ideas,
be my guest. But with or without it, this patchset fixes a whole
bunch of problem and makes ATA ACPI support sane. For more info,
please read the following message.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/17554
This patchset is against...
libata-dev#upstream(225036314e768bbfe8331ea9b0e91ca101afe427)
+ [1] libata-acpi-fix-GTF-command-protocol-for-ATAPI
Thanks.
--
tejun
[L] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/18127
[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/18122
next reply other threads:[~2007-05-05 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-05 14:50 Tejun Heo [this message]
2007-05-05 14:50 ` [PATCH 01/11] libata: separate out ata_dev_reread_id() Tejun Heo
2007-05-05 14:50 ` [PATCH 06/11] libata-acpi: implement ata_acpi_associate() Tejun Heo
2007-05-05 14:50 ` [PATCH 02/11] libata: during revalidation, check n_sectors after device is configured Tejun Heo
2007-05-05 14:50 ` [PATCH 03/11] libata-acpi: s/CONFIG_SATA_ACPI/CONFIG_ATA_ACPI/ Tejun Heo
2007-05-11 22:13 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-05 14:50 ` [PATCH 05/11] libata-acpi: add ATA_FLAG_ACPI_SATA port flag Tejun Heo
2007-05-05 14:50 ` [PATCH 04/11] libata-acpi: clean up parameters and misc stuff Tejun Heo
2007-05-05 14:50 ` [PATCH 07/11] libata-acpi: clean up ata_acpi_exec_tfs() Tejun Heo
2007-05-05 14:50 ` [PATCH 11/11] libata-acpi: implement _GTM/_STM support Tejun Heo
2007-05-05 14:50 ` [PATCH 10/11] libata-acpi: remove redundant checks Tejun Heo
2007-05-05 14:50 ` [PATCH 09/11] libata: reimplement ACPI invocation Tejun Heo
2007-05-05 14:50 ` [PATCH 08/11] libata-acpi: miscellaneous cleanups Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=11783766373569-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=forrest.zhao@gmail.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).