From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: [PATCHSET] libata: improve ATA ACPI support, take#2 Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 23:50:37 +0900 Message-ID: <11783766373569-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com> Reply-To: Tejun Heo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: jeff@garzik.org, mjg59@srcf.ucam.org, rdunlap@xenotime.net, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, forrest.zhao@gmail.com, lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, hare@suse.de, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, htejun@gmail.com List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Hello, all. This is the second take of improve-ATA-ACPI-support patchset. Changes from the last take[L] are... * s/atadev/dev/ * s/do_drive_get_GTF/ata_dev_get_GTF/ * s/do_drive_set_taskfiles/ata_dev_set_taskfiles/ As I wrote in the previous thread, I don't think automatically matching ACPI nodes to ATA ports and devices is a good idea or can be done safely, so I left that part alone. If you've got better ideas, be my guest. But with or without it, this patchset fixes a whole bunch of problem and makes ATA ACPI support sane. For more info, please read the following message. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/17554 This patchset is against... libata-dev#upstream(225036314e768bbfe8331ea9b0e91ca101afe427) + [1] libata-acpi-fix-GTF-command-protocol-for-ATAPI Thanks. -- tejun [L] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/18127 [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/18122