From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [git patches] IDE updates (part 2) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 10:08:09 +1000 Message-ID: <1192320489.22054.40.camel@pasglop> References: <200710131825.24768.bzolnier@gmail.com> <200710140009.06260.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20071013232922.3ff6a464@the-village.bc.nu> <200710140041.25152.bzolnier@gmail.com> Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200710140041.25152.bzolnier@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: Alan Cox , Linus Torvalds , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 00:41 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > On Sunday 14 October 2007, Alan Cox wrote: > > > > > /* Probably a PCI interface... */ > > > > > for (i = IDE_DATA_OFFSET; i <= IDE_STATUS_OFFSET; ++i) > > > > > hw->io_ports[i] = data_port + i - IDE_DATA_OFFSET; > > > > > hw->io_ports[IDE_CONTROL_OFFSET] = ctrl_port; > > > > Ok so in actual fact > > > > - The piece of code above can't be executed anyway > > - The ctrl_port argument is not needed ? > > pmac_ide_init_hwif_ports() is also called by ide_init_hwif_ports() > through ppc_ide_md.init_hwif. In which case it should be called with a ctrl_port right ? Ben.